← 开源
athemeroy

awesome-claude-5-5-videos

Source-linked Claude 5.5 video workflows: Opus and Sonnet demos, separately labeled next-Fable testing reports, prompts, tools and production evidence.

ListsUse casesPython
在 GitHub 打开
增长势头
+424 小时新增 Star+0.8%
537
Star
39
Fork
+28
本周
1
贡献者
创建于 2026-09-25 · 更新于 2026-10-15 · 今日第 2748 名
主要开发者
README

Awesome Claude 5.5 Videos

中文 · Complete source directory · All documentation

Selected videos, animations and reusable projects made with Claude 5.5: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku and creator-reported Fable. Explore the work, learn how it was made, and study its recurring patterns through original sources and public data.

Browse · Research findings · Make-your-own · Data and maintenance · Latest updates

Browse the work

As of 2026-10-11: 424 distinct source posts, with 199 receiving nine-frame preview sampling.

Browse by model Source posts
Opus 301
Sonnet 54
Haiku 21
Fable 68

Complete directory · Evidence and account coverage · Batch totals

Multi-model comparisons appear in several groups, so table rows do not add up. Source posts include replies and variants. Early Opus cases follow the original study scope; Fable retains creator-reported attribution.

Opus Sonnet Haiku Fable (creator report)
Braun turntable film Tower construction West Lake footage edit Doodle history
3D rendering and human direction A staged interactive scene Footage editing, chapters and captions Changing eras and a recurring character

These illustrate four different tasks, not a same-prompt model ranking. Previews received nine-frame sampling, which cannot verify full motion or model calls. Sampling notes: October 10 · October 11.

Browse frames by content and style · Browse production paths · Latest source review

Research findings

Content and color findings below use the 1,119 included files from September 26, 2026. Workflow findings use original posts, author replies and selected cases. The research guide links calculations and sources.

Content and style: games lean toward 3D, ads toward motion graphics

70.0% of game/interactive files are labeled 3D render (161/230); 71.6% of ad/launch files are labeled motion graphics/UI (154/215). Both remain the majority within their domains when only the clearer yes labels are included.

Education and stories have more varied looks. Their largest groups—motion graphics for education and flat cartoons for stories—account for 37.4% and 33.0%. Compare several treatments of a similar subject when choosing a production approach. Explore the visual atlas · Check denominators and thresholds

Color: a category can contain both dark and light treatments

The 350 motion-graphics/UI files split into 198 dark-neutral and 152 light-neutral examples. One average palette would hide these two design choices.

Music videos have a median colorful-pixel share of 45.5%, versus 17.6% for ads. Use this to explore visual references. Likes in the figure come from a separate September 27 post sample and do not establish which palette works better. Read the color study

Production: track inputs, revisions and total task cost

Three newly reviewed workflows make the division of work clearer: the Haiku West Lake brief specifies footage, narration and segment timing; an Opus-plus-nine-Sonnets article video underwent timing and narration fixes; the turntable-film author describes nine days of production with several human decisions.

Finding Source examples What to carry into your own project
A short request can have substantial inputs A mixed-media brief supplies a skill, footage and frame-level direction; a Beijing brief calls for stock footage and external narration. Prepare the assets, audio and delivery requirements together. Input analysis
One human prompt can trigger many revisions The F1 author says Opus rejected intermediate work repeatedly; five public briefs range from 172 to 17,664 visible characters. Record human prompts and internal review separately; preserve the production conditions. Prompt and input matrix, 中文
Compare the whole task bill The bridge author reports $2.19 for Haiku and $3.04 for Opus; the F1 Haiku executor accounts for 64.2% of the reported team cost. Include revisions, tools and external assets. Different tasks do not form a model ranking. Cost analysis

Five research directions and practical findings · Model labels and sampling coverage chart · Duration, prompt lengths and full snapshot figures

Make your own

Start with the task and production path

Your task Start with an example Reusable guidance
Code-drawn 2D animation Ant colony and matching source Prompt templates, 中文
An educational explainer Manim calculus lesson Content and visual checks
A 3D or real-time scene Clearwater and WebGL source Choosing a production method
Transform existing footage Talking-head line-art remake Paired input and production evidence
Direct an external video model Opus with Seedance Model and renderer roles
Build an interactive work Can-collection simulation Delivery and acceptance brief

Reusable open-source projects

Seven READMEs and root licenses checked October 11, 2026. Previews, starting files and revision records · Production brief · Seven prompt templates, 中文

Data and maintenance

The current collection counts source posts; the September 26 content and color study counts files. The frozen study has 1,401 byte-distinct files, of which 1,119 enter the classification analysis, plus 168 closely reviewed source posts. Preview sampling records visible content; creator disclosures record production claims.

What to check Where to look
Current sources, model labels and sampling status Unified CSV · Collection analysis
Content, style, duration and color calculations Statistical definitions · Color methods
Reproduce or update the repository Maintenance guide · Figure generation · Contributing

The documentation index connects every research direction, dated update and original long-form report.

Latest updates

Contributing and license

Submit a source, reusable project or correction. Distinct production methods, clear inputs and inspectable code are especially useful.

Original writing and charts use CC BY 4.0. Linked works and stills belong to their creators; see THIRD_PARTY.md. This independent project does not redistribute raw MP4s.