← 开源
WantongC

journal-adapt-writing-skill

Learn any journal's writing conventions from its published papers, then revise your manuscript to match — section by section.

AI EngineeringGive agent knowledgePrompt & Scaffold
在 GitHub 打开
增长势头
+224 小时新增 Star+0.3%
761
Star
46
Fork
+-34
本周
1
贡献者
创建于 2026-05-13 · 更新于 2026-10-16 · 今日第 4132 名
主要开发者
WantongC

WantongC/journal-adapt-writing-skill 排名第 4,132,有 761 个星标。

同类别比较

WantongC/journal-adapt-writing-skill 排名第 4,132,此处有 8 个同类条目;zarazhangrui/beautiful-feishu-whiteboard 排名第 4,130。

同类别比较
名称排名指标
sandbox-quantum/switch4,126
语言:
Python
星标数:
771
分叉数:
68
简介:
Connect any AI agent to your team in Slack, Teams & Discord. Open-source and self-hostable.
growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills4,127
语言:
TypeScript
星标数:
769
分叉数:
269
codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit4,128
语言:
C#
星标数:
765
分叉数:
173
简介:
Make Claude Code a .NET 10 Expert
zarazhangrui/beautiful-feishu-whiteboard4,130
语言:
Shell
星标数:
765
分叉数:
51
简介:
35 curated colour palette styles for building beautiful, editable Feishu / Lark (飞书) whiteboards. An agent skill.
getagentseal/founder-playbook4,136
星标数:
754
分叉数:
152
简介:
15 proven business books distilled into AI-native skills. Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor.
decebals/claude-code-java4,138
语言:
Shell
星标数:
753
分叉数:
154
简介:
Reusable AI development infrastructure for Java projects, optimized for Claude Code
allenai/reward-bench4,140
语言:
Python
星标数:
748
分叉数:
104
简介:
RewardBench: the first evaluation tool for reward models.
keli-wen/agy-staff4,144
语言:
JavaScript
星标数:
744
分叉数:
54
简介:
Hire Google's Antigravity CLI (agy) as a fast Gemini staffer for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex.
关键参数与规格
关键参数与规格
参数值
类别AI Engineering
子类别Give agent knowledge,Prompt & Scaffold
关键词Document understanding, Prompt engineering, Structured outputs, Writing
星标数761
分叉数46
贡献者1
创建日期2026-05-13
更新日期2026-10-16
1 天星标数2
7 天星标数-34
排名4,132
上次排名13,997
排名变化9,865
7 天星标排名18,989
上次 7 天星标排名18,898
7 天星标排名变化-91
总星标排名13,904
上次总星标排名13,917
总星标排名变化13
README 摘录

journal-adapt-writing-skill **A static + dynamic academic writing skill framework. Start with reusable writing rules, then generate a corpus-grounded dynamic skill for one manuscript and one writing destination. ** There are already many useful **static academic writing skills**: discipline templates, anti-AI phrasing rules, citation/equation safety rules, and general academic style guides. They are valuable, but they usually apply the same rules to every manuscript. The missing piece is **journal adaptation**. Even for the same manuscript, writing for

Journal A and writing for Journal B may require different introduction logic, contribution framing, method exposition, result emphasis, and discussion scope. A strong revision workflow should learn from the actual papers that define the target writing destination. **journal-adapt adds that dynamic layer on top of optional static skills. ** **Static skills** are reusable base rules: discipline conventions, general academic writing constraints, anti-AI phrasing cleanup, citation/equation safety, or your own lab/advisor guide. **Dynamic skills** are generated for one

manuscript and one writing destination from a user-provided corpus: target-journal papers, optional field-top or topic-similar papers, and optional user/lab exemplars. It does not auto-write a paper; it gives the agent an auditable revision framework for section-by-section academic rewriting. You can choose an existing open-source skill, bring your own, or skip this layer. | | Lab/advisor writing guide | Your group has stable style preferences. | | Journal or field checklist | You want a lightweight rule

sheet instead of a full skill. | | No static skill | You want the dynamic corpus to drive the workflow on its own. | Dynamic Corpus The dynamic corpus is the main feature. It is broader than "papers from the target journal. | | **Secondary corpus: field-top or topic-similar papers** | Optional | High-quality field writing when the target-journal corpus is small or when the topic needs extra reference points. | | **User/lab exemplars** | Optional | Author, advisor, or lab preferences that should be preserved

when they do not conflict with the target journal. | The target journal usually has the highest priority. Optional secondary papers and user/lab exemplars enrich the dynamic skill, but they do not override reviewed target-journal patterns unless the user explicitly chooses that behavior. | | P2 | Target journal corpus | Follow reviewed target-journal patterns. | | P3 | Secondary corpus and exemplars | Use high-quality field patterns or user/lab preferences when target-journal evidence is absent or weak. | | P4 | Static base skill | Apply

discipline or general writing rules when corpus signals do not decide. | | P5 | Cleanup rules | Remove AI-taste phrases, hollow transitions, generic contributions, and unsupported overclaims. Any conflict that changes revision behavior should be recorded in the revision log. If a PDF conversion is incomplete, retry conversion, use another converter, provide clean Markdown/text, or replace the paper. Install the skill For Claude Code: For Codex, copy or symlink the folder into your Codex skills directory if your local setup supports

custom skills. You can also keep the repository open and ask Codex to use directly. More detail: Installation and PDF

常见问题

记录了多少星标和分叉?

WantongC/journal-adapt-writing-skill 有 761 个星标和 46 个分叉。

仓库排名是多少?

WantongC/journal-adapt-writing-skill 排名第 4,132。

哪个仓库排名最接近?

WantongC/journal-adapt-writing-skill 与 zarazhangrui/beautiful-feishu-whiteboard 比较,后者排名第 4,130,有 765 个星标。

README

journal-adapt-writing-skill

A static + dynamic academic writing skill framework. Start with reusable writing rules, then generate a corpus-grounded dynamic skill for one manuscript and one writing destination.

There are already many useful static academic writing skills: discipline templates, anti-AI phrasing rules, citation/equation safety rules, and general academic style guides. They are valuable, but they usually apply the same rules to every manuscript.

The missing piece is journal adaptation. Even for the same manuscript, writing for Journal A and writing for Journal B may require different introduction logic, contribution framing, method exposition, result emphasis, and discussion scope. A strong revision workflow should learn from the actual papers that define the target writing destination.

journal-adapt adds that dynamic layer on top of optional static skills.

  • Static skills are reusable base rules: discipline conventions, general academic writing constraints, anti-AI phrasing cleanup, citation/equation safety, or your own lab/advisor guide.
  • Dynamic skills are generated for one manuscript and one writing destination from a user-provided corpus: target-journal papers, optional field-top or topic-similar papers, and optional user/lab exemplars.

The result is a visible, editable dynamic_writing_skill.md. It does not auto-write a paper; it gives the agent an auditable revision framework for section-by-section academic rewriting.


Static + Dynamic

flowchart TD
    A[Optional Static Skills\nreusable base rules] --> E[Dynamic Writing Skill]
    B[Target Journal Papers\nprimary corpus] --> D[Corpus Style Profile]
    C[Field-top or Topic-similar Papers\noptional] --> D
    U[User / Lab Exemplars\noptional] --> D
    D --> E
    E --> F[Human Review]
    F --> G[Section Revision]
    G --> H[Revision Log]

    style E fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50
    style F fill:#f5f0e8,stroke:#999

Optional Static Skills

The static layer is optional. You can choose an existing open-source skill, bring your own, or skip this layer.

Static option Field / purpose Source
Economics writing Economics writing and referee-style guidance hanlulong/econ-writing-skill
ML / CV / NLP writing Research paper writing for ML-style papers Master-cai/Research-Paper-Writing-Skills
CS / research paper writing Research paper pipeline for CS systems, networking, and ML-adjacent papers SNL-UCSB/paper-writing-skill
Philosophy / interdisciplinary writing Academic paper planning and composition lishix520/academic-paper-skills
General AI-writing cleanup Generic AI-writing cleanup / humanizing constraints blader/humanizer

More details: Static Skill Recommendations.

You can also use a custom static skill:

Custom input Use when
Your own SKILL.md You already have reusable agent instructions.
Lab/advisor writing guide Your group has stable style preferences.
Journal or field checklist You want a lightweight rule sheet instead of a full skill.
No static skill You want the dynamic corpus to drive the workflow on its own.

Dynamic Corpus

The dynamic corpus is the main feature. It is broader than "papers from the target journal."

Corpus role Required? What it contributes
Primary corpus: target-journal papers Yes The journal's local writing culture: structure, contribution framing, method/result exposition, discussion scope.
Secondary corpus: field-top or topic-similar papers Optional High-quality field writing when the target-journal corpus is small or when the topic needs extra reference points.
User/lab exemplars Optional Author, advisor, or lab preferences that should be preserved when they do not conflict with the target journal.

The target journal usually has the highest priority. Optional secondary papers and user/lab exemplars enrich the dynamic skill, but they do not override reviewed target-journal patterns unless the user explicitly chooses that behavior.

Priority System

Priority Source Rule
P1 Hard constraints Preserve facts, citations, equations, notation, numerical results, labels, and author-defined terminology.
P2 Target journal corpus Follow reviewed target-journal patterns.
P3 Secondary corpus and exemplars Use high-quality field patterns or user/lab preferences when target-journal evidence is absent or weak.
P4 Static base skill Apply discipline or general writing rules when corpus signals do not decide.
P5 Cleanup rules Remove AI-taste phrases, hollow transitions, generic contributions, and unsupported overclaims.

P1 always wins. P2 usually beats P3 and P4. Any conflict that changes revision behavior should be recorded in the revision log.


Corpus Preparation

Recommended starting point:

Corpus role Recommended size
Primary corpus: target-journal papers 5-8 papers
Secondary corpus: field-top or topic-similar papers 2-5 papers
User/lab exemplars 1-3 documents

All corpus files should be fully readable Markdown/text before Phase 1. If a PDF conversion is incomplete, retry conversion, use another converter, provide clean Markdown/text, or replace the paper.


Quick Start

1. Install the skill

For Claude Code:

mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/journal-adapt
cp -R skill/* ~/.claude/skills/journal-adapt/

For Codex, copy or symlink the skill/ folder into your Codex skills directory if your local setup supports custom skills. You can also keep the repository open and ask Codex to use skill/SKILL.md directly.

More detail: Installation and PDF Conversion.

2. Prepare inputs

Minimum Markdown workflow, no MinerU required:

my_project/
├── corpus/
│   ├── target_journal_001.md
│   ├── target_journal_002.md
│   └── field_top_paper_001.md
└── manuscript.md

PDF workflow:

my_project/
├── corpus_pdfs/
│   ├── paper_001.pdf
│   └── paper_002.pdf
└── manuscript.pdf

PDF input requires a PDF-to-Markdown converter. MinerU is supported, but Markdown input is the recommended path if MinerU is hard to install.

3. Invoke

/journal-adapt

Or ask:

Help me build a dynamic writing skill for my manuscript using these target-journal papers and this base writing skill.

The skill will ask for:

  1. Target journal or writing destination
  2. Primary corpus folder
  3. Optional secondary corpus folder
  4. Optional user/lab exemplar files
  5. Optional base writing skill
  6. Manuscript file
  7. Sections to revise

Output

Saved next to the manuscript:

[manuscript_name]_revised/
├── dynamic_writing_skill.md
├── style_profile.md
├── abstract_revised.md
├── introduction_revised.md
├── ...
├── [section]_revision_log.md
└── revision_summary.md

The revised files are Markdown. Move them into LaTeX, Word, or another writing environment after review.


Example

examples/jeem/ shows an anonymized MVP run for the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management:

  • corpus-role metadata
  • conversion gate report
  • aggregated style profile
  • generated dynamic writing skill
  • sanitized section diagnosis, revision sample, and revision log

Raw PDFs, converted full text, and the private manuscript are not included.


Documentation


Known Limitations

  • English-language academic writing only.
  • PDF conversion quality depends on the converter. MinerU can fail on some local setups.
  • The project extracts writing structure and rhetorical patterns only. It must not quote or paraphrase copyrighted corpus papers.
  • The generated dynamic skill needs human review before revision begins.
  • The tool does not add facts, citations, results, or claims that are not already in the manuscript.

Contributing

Useful contributions include:

  • new static base writing skills for disciplines not covered here
  • better installation paths for Claude Code, Codex, and other agent environments
  • safer PDF-to-Markdown conversion recipes
  • more anonymized example corpora
  • improvements to style-card and revision-log templates

One base skill per file is preferred. Keep example corpora free of copyrighted full text and unpublished manuscript details.


License

MIT

排名相邻
同类项目