← Open Source
NeuroDong

Ai-Review

Large model-assisted paper review.

ApplicationsResearch & knowledge
Open on GitHub
Momentum
+2stars in 24 hours+0.3%
631
Stars
48
Forks
+5
This week
2
Contributors
Created 2025-09-13 · Updated 2026-10-16 · #4205 today
Top developers
NeuroDongDanield21

NeuroDong/Ai-Review is ranked 4,205 with 631 stars.

Same-category comparison

NeuroDong/Ai-Review is ranked 4,205 among these 8 peers; lukaszliniewicz/Pandrator is ranked 4,203.

Same-category comparison
NameRankMetrics
umputun/agterm4,180
Language:
Swift
Stars:
674
Forks:
95
Description:
A genuinely good terminal.
Agent-Field/pr-af4,191
Language:
Go
Stars:
654
Forks:
74
Description:
#1 open-source code reviewer on Code-Review-Bench.
argos-ci/argos4,201
Language:
TypeScript
Stars:
640
Forks:
67
Description:
The open source visual testing platform for teams and AI agents. Review the product, not just the code.
lukaszliniewicz/Pandrator4,203
Language:
Python
Stars:
635
Forks:
50
Description:
Turn PDFs and EPUBs into audiobooks; subtitles or videos into dubbed videos (including translation), and more. For free. Pandrator uses local models, including voice-cloning (instant, RVC-enhanced, XTTS fine-tuning) and LLM processing. It aspires to be a user-friendly app with a GUI, an installer and all-in-one packages.
OpenLabs-so/openanalytics4,207
Language:
TypeScript
Stars:
628
Forks:
50
Description:
Open-source, privacy-first and cookieless web analytics with revenue attribution and an MCP server.
Nigh/show-me-the-story4,210
Language:
Go
Stars:
626
Forks:
81
kxxt/chatgpt-action4,214
Language:
JavaScript
Stars:
622
Forks:
60
Description:
Let ChatGPT review PRs for you.
viticci/remctl4,218
Language:
HTML
Stars:
616
Forks:
40
Description:
An Apple Reminders CLI for power users and AI agents. RemCTL supports all the latest Reminders features such as sections, subtasks, tags, rich links, groceries lists, templates, smart lists, and image attachments. (Not affiliated with Apple.).
Key parameters and specifications
Key parameters and specifications
ParameterValue
CategoryApplications
SubcategoryResearch & knowledge
KeywordsDocument understanding, Prompt engineering, Structured outputs
Stars631
Forks48
Contributors2
Created date2025-09-13
Updated date2026-10-16
Stars in 1 day2
Stars in 7 days5
Rank4,205
Previous rank15,626
Rank change11,421
7-day stars rank5,745
Previous 7-day stars rank7,366
7-day stars rank change1,621
Total stars rank16,139
Previous total stars rank16,152
Total stars rank change13
README summary

Chinese 📢 Latest News **[20/08/2026]** Added **Relative Rank**: compare your manuscript with papers from a target venue (or ones you upload) and see where it stands. Evaluation on 100 pools: Examples/Relative_Rank_evaluation. 📖 About Ai-Review This repository is dedicated to using AI to optimize papers, making it easier for researchers to check the strengths, weaknesses, and improvement suggestions of manuscripts, and to gauge how competitive a paper is relative to comparable work. The following figure is a

usage preview: 🚀 Usage Tutorial 🌐 I. Basic review (LLM) **Entry**: **Steps**: Upload your PDF manuscript, choose a prompting mode (e. SoT, Few-Shot), and click to get structured Strengths, Weaknesses, Suggestions, etc. **Note**: You can use the quick demo on the page or configure your own API (e. VLM review **Entry**: **Steps**: Upload a PDF; the system captures page snapshots and runs VLM review, so layout and figures are taken into account. Best when you need the model to see figures

and equation layout. Prompt-injection detection **Entry**: **Steps**: Upload a PDF; the system checks whether the file contains hidden instructions meant to steer or override an AI reviewer. **Note**: Use this before relying on an AI review if you worry the PDF may have been tampered with. Relative Rank (competitiveness ranking) **Entry**: **Steps**: Upload your PDF manuscript. ICLR, NeurIPS) so the system can select comparison papers from that venue’s accepted list, or upload comparison papers yourself. Every PDF is

anonymized, then the pool is ranked by competitiveness so you can see where your manuscript stands. **Note**: This is a relative ranking among the papers in the pool, not a conference decision or an accept/reject prediction. Review tells you how to improve; Relative Rank tells you where you stand against comparable work. Evaluation on 100 pools (pairwise accuracy 83. 8%): see Examples/Relative_Rank_evaluation. Skills On platforms that support Agent Skills (e. Cursor), you can use Ai-Review

as a Skill and get reviews directly in the chat. Get and install The repo includes the Skill definition at: ai-review-skills/SKILL. md In Cursor: place the folder under in your project or in your user directory. Follow your platform’s instructions for loading Skills. Supported formats **LaTeX**: **PDF**: **Word**: / 3. How to use and trigger Say: use @ai-review-skills to review @paper. The agent will call the Ai-Review Skill to generate the review. 🔄 Continuous Update

This repository will be updated continuously. Welcome to use this repository, raise issues, and submit pull requests to help improve the prompt templates and website features, thereby helping the community improve paper quality and acceptance probability. 📄 Review Example Please see: Review example of "Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition". Relative Rank evaluation (100 pools on PeerRead ICLR 2017): Examples/Relative_Rank_evaluation. 🧠 Prompt Engineering ***Reverse Prompt (Included)***: Infer prompts from excellent results generated by large models. The excellent results here

come from the AI review at AAAI2026. ***Few-Shot Prompting (Included)***: In the web UI, select "Prompt + Examples (Few-Shot

Frequently asked questions

How many stars and forks are recorded?

NeuroDong/Ai-Review has 631 stars and 48 forks.

What is the repository rank?

NeuroDong/Ai-Review is ranked 4,205.

Which repository is closest in rank?

NeuroDong/Ai-Review is compared with lukaszliniewicz/Pandrator, ranked 4,203 with 635 stars.

Nearby in the ranking
Similar items