paper-lifecycle
Codex skill for full academic paper lifecycle analysis and revision.
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle is ranked 14,872 with 696 stars.
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle is ranked 14,872 among these 8 peers; alfianlosari/ChatGPTSwiftUI is ranked 14,873.
| Name | Rank | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| eat-pray-ai/yutu | 14,842 |
|
| gensyn-ai/codeassist | 14,853 |
|
| steven-tey/extrapolate | 14,859 |
|
| EurekaClaw/EurekaClaw | 14,860 |
|
| alfianlosari/ChatGPTSwiftUI | 14,873 |
|
| tracefinity/tracefinity | 14,876 |
|
| xynehq/xyne | 14,877 |
|
| Amery2010/peinture | 14,878 |
|
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Applications |
| Subcategory | Research & knowledge |
| Keywords | Document understanding, Research, Writing |
| Stars | 696 |
| Forks | 38 |
| Contributors | 1 |
| Created date | 2026-06-15 |
| Updated date | 2026-10-13 |
| Stars in 1 day | 0 |
| Stars in 7 days | 4 |
| Rank | 14,872 |
| Previous rank | 14,710 |
| Rank change | -162 |
| 7-day stars rank | 6,407 |
| Previous 7-day stars rank | 4,867 |
| 7-day stars rank change | -1,540 |
| Total stars rank | 14,947 |
| Previous total stars rank | 14,915 |
| Total stars rank change | -32 |
The repository root is documentation only. The actual installable skills are two sibling directories: Skills **Review Revision** Path: Purpose: reviewer-style diagnosis and revision planning for an existing manuscript, draft, rejected paper, or paper idea with a concrete direction. It checks whether the problem is real, the insight is defensible, the novelty holds, the method serves the mechanism, the experiments support the claims, and the writing guides reviewers through the argument. Use it for: PDF, LaTeX, Word, or Markdown manuscript
diagnosis A-tier, journal, or workshop submission checklists section-level revision for introduction, related work, method, and experiments theory, statistics, reproducibility, figures, and table audits Prompt: **Rebuttal Response** Path: Purpose: review-response and rebuttal planning. It turns reviews into a decision-ready evidence package for the AC: which concerns can change the decision, which reviewers are persuadable, what evidence to add, how to write an AC-facing summary, how to draft per-reviewer responses, and how to correct factual misunderstandings
without sounding hostile. Use it for: triaging reviews and ranking concerns writing an AC-facing executive summary responding to novelty, baseline, experimental setup, method motivation, scope, and factual-error objections removing excessive apology, defensiveness, vague promises, and hostile wording producing a rebuttal checklist and camera-ready promise list Prompt: Codex Installation Clone the suite into a normal directory, then link each skill into the Codex skills directory. Windows PowerShell: macOS / Linux: Claude / Claude Code / Other Agents If you are not
using the Codex skill loader, ask the agent to read the relevant skill directory directly. Review Revision: Recommended prompt: Rebuttal Response: Recommended prompt: Repository Structure
How many stars and forks are recorded?
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle has 696 stars and 38 forks.
What is the repository rank?
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle is ranked 14,872.
Which repository is closest in rank?
M1n-n9/paper-lifecycle is compared with alfianlosari/ChatGPTSwiftUI, ranked 14,873 with 696 stars.